Eten glofiish M810 Screen Size Dimensions
Eten glofiish M810 screen size dimensions, viewport size, pixel density and more information.
Specs:
WIDTH | 320 px |
---|---|
HEIGHT | 240 px |
SCREEN SIZE INCH | 2.8" |
PX DENSITY | ~143 ppi |
ASPECT RATIO | 1 1/3 |
DISPLAY TYPE | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors |
PHYSICAL SIZE MM | 109.5 x 59 x 17.5 mm |
OPERATING SYSTEM | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.0 Professional |
RELEASE DATE | Released 2008, August |
Information:
The Eten glofiish M810 features a 2.8-inch TFT resistive touchscreen with a screen width of 320 pixels and a screen height of 240 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of approximately 143 pixels per inch (PPI). This screen size and resolution are suitable for users who prioritize portability and one-handed use, as the compact size allows for easy handling and pocketability. The 65K colors and aspect ratio of 1 1/3 contribute to a vibrant and visually pleasing display, making it suitable for tasks such as web browsing, messaging, and basic multimedia consumption.
The physical dimensions of the device, measuring 109.5 x 59 x 17.5 mm (4.31 x 2.32 x 0.69 in), complement the screen size by providing a compact form factor that is comfortable to hold and operate with one hand. This makes it convenient for users who are frequently on the move and value a device that can be easily carried and used in various environments.
The inclusion of a resistive touchscreen is beneficial for users who prefer using a stylus or need to interact with the screen while wearing gloves, as resistive touchscreens are known for their compatibility with stylus input and their ability to register touch through pressure. This can be particularly useful for users who need precise input, such as professionals who rely on accurate data entry or note-taking.
Overall, the screen specifications of the Eten glofiish M810 cater to users who prioritize portability, one-handed usability, and the ability to interact with the screen using a stylus or under conditions where capacitive touchscreens may not be as effective.